Disposed

M.Nagamalli v. The Managing Director

Madras HC11 Feb 2023CMA/334/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a National Lok Adalat mediated settlement under Chapter VI of the LSA Act, 1987, the parties settled a motor accident claim. The appellants agreed to deposit Rs.11,00,000/- as full and final settlement, disposing of the appeal and connected petitions. Court fees were ordered refunded.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.334 of 2022 is disposed of upon recording the settlement agreement.

M.Nagamalli Vs The Managing Director — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI Saturday, the 11^th day of February 2023 NATIONAL LOK ADALAT AWARD

¶2

(Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987)

¶3

Presided over by

¶4

The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and

¶5

Member :

¶6

Mr. S.Boothanathan (Retd.D.J.) Mrs. S.Sridevi (Advocate)

¶7

C.M.A.No.334 of 2022

¶8

(Appeal against the Judgment and Decree dated 08.07.2021 made in M.C.O.P.No.2549 of 2017 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (IV Small Causes Court), Chennai.)

¶9

1.M.Nagamalli

¶10

2.D.Mathivanan ... Appellants

¶11

Versus

¶12

The Managing Director, Metropolitan Transport Corporation Limited, Pallavan House, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002. ... Respondent

¶13

This case came up for settlement before the Lok Adalat. Mr.K.Varadha Kamaraj , learned counsel for the appellants and Mr.A.Vinodraj, learned Counsel for the respondent. After mutual discussion and negotiation between both parties they arrived at a compromise to settle the matter as follows:

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

Page 1 of 4

¶16

TERMS OF SETTLEMENT

¶17

As against the award amount of Rs.8,65,600/- with further interest at the rate of 7.5%, the parties have agreed to settle for a total as full quit. The entire amount of Rs.11,00,000/- (Rupees Eleven Lakhs only) shall be deposited to the credit of MCOP.No.2549 of 2017.

¶18

2.In view of the above, the settlement for the total sum of

¶19

Rs.11,00,000/- (Rupees Eleven Lakhs only) as full quit is recorded.

¶20

3.The appellant undertakes and as such is directed to deposit the entire amount of Rs.11,00,000/-, within a period of eight weeks from today. The Claimant/Appellants will be entitled to withdraw the said sum on proper identification and verification in accordance with the terms of the award, without insisting on any formal permission petition.

¶21

4.In view of the same, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands disposed off. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition/s is/are closed, if any.

¶22

1.M.Nagamalli 2.D.Mathivanan Counsel for the Appellants

¶23

The Managing Director, Metropolitan Transport Corporation Limited, Pallavan House, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

¶24

Counsel for the Appellant

¶25

Page 2 of 4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

This Lok Adalat award is passed in terms of the above settlement.

¶28

The full court fee paid shall be refunded to the appellant in the manner provided under Section 69-A of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and suits Valuation Act, 1955 and the Court Fees Act, 1870 as provided for under sub Sec.1 of Section 2 r/w 25 of LSA Act 1987 as amended in 1994.

Judge

Member

Member

To: The parties/Advocate concerned

¶33

Copy to:

¶34

The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, IV Small Causes Court, Chennai.

¶35

The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai.

¶36

The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras.

¶37

The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, High Court Madras. +2 copies

¶38

klt

¶39

Page 3 of 4

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

D.Bharatha Chakravarthy,J.

klt

C.M.A.No.334 of 2022

11.02.2023

Page 4 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.Nagamalli v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Nagamalli v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sakthivel (Deceased) Vs the State Rep by Its

T.Arul Sundari Vs State Represented by

Ravi Sha Vs the Inspector of Police

The Management Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Labour

E.Jayalakshmi Vs S.Suresh Babu

The Management Vs The Special Deputy Commissioner of Labour