The Madurai Bench, in a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a prior order, noted that the respondents informed the SubRegistrar that they had permitted transaction registration. The Court held that no further adjudication was necessary and closed the petition.
Contempt Petition closed; no punishment imposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont. P(MD)No.1861 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 10.04.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
Cont. P(MD)No.1861 of 2022 in
W.P(MD)No.7433 of 2012
R.Manivannan
... Petitioner/
Petitioner
Vs.
Madurai District.
... Contemnors/ Respondents No.1 & 2
PRAYER : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for the deliberate and willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.7433 of 2012 dated 16.08.2022.
1/4
Cont. P(MD)No.1861 of 2022
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Kirubakaran
For Respondents : Mr.N.GA.Natraj Government Advocate
ORDER
The present Contempt Petition has been filed alleging violation of the order of this Court dated 16.08.2022.
10.04.2023
2/4
Cont. P(MD)No.1861 of 2022
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No BTR To
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai, Madurai District. 2.The Tahsildar, Madurai South, Madurai District.
3/4
Cont. P(MD)No.1861 of 2022
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
BTR
Order made in Cont. P(MD)No.1861 of 2022
10.04.2023
4/4
3 issues framed by the court
Whether further adjudication is required in the contempt petition given that the respondents informed the SubRegistrar to proceed with registration.
Whether the Contempt Petition should be closed without further punishment for disobedience of the prior order.
Whether the communication from the Tahsildar sufficiently demonstrates compliance with the earlier order to preclude contempt proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R. Manivannan
Sugipremala
The Revenue Divisional Officer
Kalyanasundaram
R. Vijayakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
