K.Krishnan v. K.Geetha
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a contempt petition for disobedience of an interim order. The Government Advocate submitted that the order had been complied with, resulting in the closure of the contempt petition.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition stands closed.
What the court decided
Cont.P(MD)No.1852 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 22.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
Cont.P(MD)No.1852 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.20678 of 2023
K.Krishnan ... Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
1.Dr.K.Geetha,
The Directorate of Collegiate Education (FAC), Institute of Advanced Study in Education Campus, 577, Anna Salai,
Saidapet,
Chennai – 15.
2.Dr.P.Ponmuthuramalingam,
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Krishnan
- respondent
Dr.K.Geetha
- respondent
Dr.P.Ponmuthuramalingam
- respondent
Dr.K.Duraiarasan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court