Allowed

Saraswathi v. Krishnamoorthy (Died), 2. Seethalakshmi

Madras HC21 Nov 2023CMP(MD)/15371/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

, the Madurai Bench allowed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition seeking to set aside a default order. The Court restored the Second Appeal (S.A. No. 468 of 2007) to the file, heard both sides, and directed posting of the main case. The petitioner filed under O. 41 Rule 19 R/W 151 CPC.

What did the court decide?

The order dismissing the Second Appeal for default was set aside and the Second Appeal was restored.

Saraswathi Vs Krishnamoorthy (Died), 2… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Tuesday, the Twenty First day of November Two Thousand and Twenty Three PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice L. VICTORIA GOWRI

¶2

CMP(MD). No.15371 of 2023 in S.A.(MD)No.468 of 2007

¶3

Saraswathi,

¶4

W/o.Govindaraj,

¶5

Door No.19 State Bank Officers Ii Colony,

¶6

Bye Pass Road Madurai Town ... Petitioner/Appellant

¶7

¶8

1.Krishnamoorthy (Died)

¶9

2.Seethalakshmi

¶10

3.K.Kumar

¶11

4.K.Mohan ...Respondents/Respondents

¶12

Prayer in CMP(MD)No.15371 of 2023 :-

¶13

Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed Under Order 41 Rule 19 R/W 151 of C.P.C to set aside the order dated 05.08.2022 passed in SA(MD).No. 468 of 2007 dismissed for default and to restore the same and thus render justice.

¶14

Prayer in S.A.(MD)No.468 of 2007:-

¶15

Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and decree made in A.S.No.39 of 2002, dated 11.03.2005, on the file of Sub Judge, Sivagangai confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.69 of 2000, dated 31.10.2001, on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Sivagangai.

¶16

ORDER:- This Civil Miscellaneous Petition coming on for orders on this day and

¶17

upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

1/3

¶20

hearing the arguments of Mr.B.Sathish Sundar, Advocate for the Petitioner and

¶21

Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan, Advocate for the Second Respondent, this Court made the following order:

¶22

This petition is filed to set aside the order dated 05.08.2022 passed by this

¶23

Court in S.A.(MD)No.468 of 2007.

¶24

Heard both sides.

¶25

Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this

¶26

petition is allowed. Registry is directed to restore the Second Appeal.

¶27

Post the main case on 29.11.2023.

¶28

Sd/-

¶29

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶30

// True Copy //

¶31

/11/2023 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶32

¶33

1.The Subordinate Judge, Sivagangai.

¶34

2.The Principal District Munsif, Sivagangai.

¶35

Copy to: The Section Officer, Judicial Section(Posting), Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

2/3

¶38

ORDER DATED : 21/11/2023

¶39

========================== ORDER(Restoration) ========================== CMP(MD). No.15371 of 2023 in S.A.(MD)No. Giving direction and etc. as stated within. KB(28.11.2023) 3P 4C

¶40

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17.07.2023.

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

3/3

Saraswathi v. Krishnamoorthy (Died), 2. Seethalakshmi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saraswathi v. Krishnamoorthy (Died), 2. Seethalakshmi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Samuthirakani, Vs Kasirajan

A/M Sonai Poosari Kovil, a Pvt. Vs P.Elumalai

The American College Vs the University Grants Commission

The Managing Director Vs Samudhayamani

K.Krishnan Vs K.Geetha

Subramanian. R Vs The Management of