M.Paul Raj v. Raja
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition for contempt ordered closed because the respondent filed a compliance report confirming that all encroachments were removed on 15.11.2023, satisfying the prior court order. No further punishment ordered.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed; no punishment imposed due to compliance with court order.
What the court decided
CONT.P.(MD)No.1646 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 21.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
CONT.P.(MD)No.1646 of 2023
M.Paul Raj
... Petitioner
Vs.
Mr.Raja, Assistant Executive Engineer, Highways Construction and Maintenance, Uthamapalayam, Theni District.
...Respondent
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Paul Raj
- respondent
Mr.Raja
Coram
S.M.S
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court