Disposed

Dr. Ambedkar Education Trust and A.E. Dr. Ambedkar Makkal Eyakkam, v. M. Pradeep Kumar I.A.S.

Madras HC31 Oct 2023CONT P(MD)/1628/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this closed contempt petition, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court accepted proof showing that the flag mast erected in violation of a prior order had been removed and the road reopened, thereby satisfying the compliance required.

What did the court decide?

The contempt petition was closed due to proof of compliance (removal of flag mast and opening of the road).

Dr. Ambedkar Education Trust and A.E. Dr. Ambedkar Makkal Eyakkam, Vs M. Pradeep Kumar I.A.S. — Madras HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Cont.P.(MD) No.1628 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 31.10.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

¶6

Cont.P.(MD) No.1628 of 2023 in W.P.(MD) No.8244 of 2023

¶7

Dr.Ambedkar Education Trust and A.E.Dr.Ambedkar Makkal Eyakkam rep.by its President Gururaj S/o.Ramasamy 126 A, Pudukkottai Main Road Krishnan Kovil Street Sembattu Airport Post, Trichy ... Petitioner

¶8

-vs-

¶9

M.Pradeep Kumar, I.A.S., District Collector Office of the District Collector Trichy ... Respondent

¶10

_____________ Page 1 of 4_

¶11

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶12

Cont.P.(MD) No.1628 of 2023

¶13

PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondent for the willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD) No.8244 of 2023, dated

¶14

20.04.2023.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sathya Chidambaram For Respondent : Mr.S.P.Maharajan Special Government Pleader

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.]

¶18

This contempt petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience of the order, dated 20.04.2023, made in W.P.(MD) No.8244 of 2023.

¶19

2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent furnished a copy of the letter, dated 30.10.2023, sent by the Tahsildar, Thiruverumbur, to the Additional Advocate General-VI, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, along with photographs stating that the flag mast erected in the Highways Road has been removed and the road is kept open for the benefit of the road users / general public.

¶20

_____________ Page 2 of 4_

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

Cont.P.(MD) No.1628 of 2023

¶23

3. Recording the same, the contempt petition is closed.

¶24

[S.M.S., J.] [L.V.G., J.] 31.10.2023

¶25

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶26

krk

¶27

To: Mr.M.Pradeep Kumar, I.A.S., District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Trichy.

¶28

Page 3 of 4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

Cont.P.(MD) No.1628 of 2023

¶31

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

¶32

krk

¶33

Cont.P.(MD) No.1628 of 2023 in W.P.(MD) No.8244 of 2023

¶34

31.10.2023

¶35

_____________ Page 4 of 4_

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Dr. Ambedkar Education Trust and A.E. Dr. Ambedkar Makkal Eyakkam, v. M. Pradeep Kumar I.A.S.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Ambedkar Education Trust and A.E. Dr. Ambedkar Makkal Eyakkam, v. M. Pradeep Kumar I.A.S.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shanmugasundaram Vs Shanthi Devi

R. Priyatharshini Vs K. John Pakkiya Selvam

S.Saravanan Vs Senthilraj I.A.S.

G.Rajkumar Vs K.J.Praveen Kumar I.A.S.

K.Senthilkumar Vs P. Kumar Singh

Kathiresan. C Vs The District Collector