Indirani, v. G.Karthikeyan, I.P.S.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses a contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act against the Commissioner of Police, Trichy City. The court accepted the submission that the underlying dispute is of a civil nature, thereby closing the petition and allowing the petitioner to seek alternative remedies.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition closed. Petitioner allowed to work out her remedy in accordance with law.
What the court decided
Cont.P(MD).No.1514 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 04.12.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN
Cont.P(MD). No.1514 of 2022 in Crl.O.P(MD).No.9809 of 2020
Indirani
... Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
G.Karthikeyan, I.P.S., The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City. ... Contemnor/Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent herein for their wilful and wanton disobedience of the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in the above Crl.O.P(MD). No.9809 of 2020, dated on 16.09.2020 under the Contempt of
Courts Act.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the earlier order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Indirani
- respondent
G. Karthikeyan
Coram
K.K.Ramakrishnan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court