D.Jeyapal v. S.Krishnan,Ias., and another
Case brief
What is this about?
A petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 seeking punishment for disobedience of a judgment was closed. The Respondents confirmed that the petitioner had been permitted to retire and his pensionary benefits were disbursed pursuant to a Government order.
What did the court decide?
Nil
What the court decided
Cont.P.No.518 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.09.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
Cont.P.No.518 of 2023
D. Jeyapal
... Petitioner
Versus
1.S.Krishnan, I.A.S., Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Industries Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.
2.V.Vishnu, I.A.S., District Collector, Thirunelveli District, Thirunelveli – 627 009.
... Respondents
Prayer : - This petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 10.12.2021 passed in W.P.No.18613 of 2018.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D. Jeyapal
- respondent
1.S.Krishnan
- respondent
2.V.Vishnu
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court