A contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, was closed as the petitioner's counsel withdrew the petition without pressing it for the present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.388 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.09.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
Cont.P.No.388 of 2023
R. Marasamy
... Petitioner
Versus
1.Shiv Das Meena, The Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.
2.R. Selvaraj, I.A.S., Commissioner of Town Panchayat, MRC Nagar, Santhome, Chennai – 600 028.
3.S. Balakrishnan, Executive Officer, Jambai Town Panchayat, Jambai, Bhavani Taluk, Erode District.
... Respondents
1
Cont.P.No.388 of 2023
Prayer : - This petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 28.01.2022 passed in W.P.No.17698 of 2019.
For Petitioner : Mr. N. Manoharan For Respondents : Mr. S. Silambanan, AAG – II Asst. by S. Ravikumar, SGP
ORDER
This petition has been filed seeking to punish the respondents for the willful disobedience of the order dated 28.01.2022 in W.P.No.17698 of 2019.
2.My attention is drawn to the order of the Division Bench dated 01.06.2023 in W.A.No.1022 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.10207 of 2023, which is as follows:
“Mr.N.Manokaran, learned counsel appearing for the first
respondent/caveator fairly submitted that he is not pressing
the contempt petition for the present.
2
Cont.P.No.388 of 2023
2.The above submission made by the learned counsel for the
first respondent/caveator is recorded.
3.Mr.S.Silambannan, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.C.Selvaraj, learned counsel for the appellant, seeks two weeks time to get instructions.
Post the matter after two weeks.”
3.In view of the undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioner herein, this contempt petition stands closed for the present.
13.09.2023
smv Neutral Citiation : Yes / No Index : Yes / No
3
Cont.P.No.388 of 2023
C.V. KARTHIKEYAN, J. smv
Cont.P.No.388 of 2023
13.09.2023
4
R. Marasamy
Shiv Das Meena
R. Selvaraj
S. Balakrishnan
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
