Vasu v. Muralikumar B.
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition filed to punish respondents for disobeying a prior order. The court noted that a State Level Scrutiny Committee found the petitioner's community certificate genuine, recording the proceedings from 04.01.2022.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed based on the State Level Scrutiny Committee's finding of genuineness of the community certificate.
What the court decided
Cont.Petn.No.266 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.08.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. B.BALAJI
Cont. Petn. No.266 of 2019
R.Vasu
... Petitioner
Vs.
- B.Muralikumar, The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Admn), Union of India, Chennai-34.
- Dr.Amar Veer Singh, The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, No.2, V.P.Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Bibikulam, Madurai District 625 002.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to punish respondents for willful disobedience of this Court's order in W.P.No.14477/2014.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R. Vasu
- respondent
B. Muralikumar
- respondent
Dr. Amar Veer Singh
- respondent
Mr. D. Albert Manohar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court