M.Mohamed Ithris v. K.Elangovan
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of a previous order. The respondent submitted proof of compliance via a settlement and cheque. The court accepted the submission and closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition was closed as the order of the Court was found to be complied with.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.2531 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.02.2023
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
Contempt Petition No.2531 of 2022
M.Mohamed Ithris ... Petitioner
...Vs...
Mr.K.Ilangovan The Managing Director, State Express Transport Corporation, (Tamilnadu) Ltd., Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002. .... Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for having committed contempt by wilful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P.No.44251 of 2016 dated 26.07.2021.
O R D E R
This contempt petition has been filed alleging non compliance of
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent had complied with the order of this Court dated 26.07.2021.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Mohamed Ithris
- respondent
Mr.K.Ilangovan
Coram
S. Vaidyanathan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court