A.Ponnambalam v. Elangovan
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the Court was advised that the impugned order dated 31.03.2021 had been complied with via a cheque deposit. The Petitioner was informed that further challenges to the settlement must be filed elsewhere.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed; no costs awarded; Petitioner allowed to challenge settlement before appropriate forum if aggrieved.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.1695 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.02.2023
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
Contempt Petition No.1695 of 2022
A.Ponnambalam ... Petitioner
...Vs...
Elangovan Managing Director, The State Express Transport Corporation, No.2, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002. .... Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for committing contempt of Court for not obeying the order of this Court in W.P.No.1698 of 2021 dated 31.03.2021.
O R D E R
This contempt petition has been filed alleging non compliance of
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.Ponnambalam
- respondent
Elangovan
Coram
S.Vaidyanathan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court