V.Narasimman v. Supriya Sahu IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition filed for disobedience of a prior order, the respondent submitted that the order was complied with, the petitioner concurred, and the court closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition is closed as the prayed relief has been complied with.
What the court decided
Cont.P. No.2235 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Contempt Petition No.2235 of 2023
V. Narasimman .. Petitioner
Versus
Mrs.Supriya Sahu, I.A.S., Secretary to Government, Environment and Forest Department, Fort. St. George, Chenani – 600 009.
.. Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act 1971 to punish the respondent for Contempt of Court for the wilful disobedience of the order of this Court made in W.P. No.27267 of 2022 dated 13.10.2022.
For Petitioner : Ms.K. Jenitha For Respondent : Mr.V.Ramesh, Government Advocate
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Narasimman
- respondent
Mrs. Supriya Sahu
Coram
Abdul Quddhose
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court