Petitioners withdrew the contempt petition concerning violation of a 2019 injunction order. The court held no issue for adjudication and closed the petition.
Contempt Petition closed as no issue arises for adjudication following withdrawal by petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.1704 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.09.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
Contempt Petition No.1704 of 2019
... Respondents/Respondents
Page 1 of 4
PRAYER:
Cont.P.No.1704 of 2019
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for violating the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 12.02.2019 made in O.A.No. 530 of 2018.
For Petitioners : Mr. D.Rajagopal
For Respondents : No appearance
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioners has filed the following memo :-
“ MEMO FILED ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONERS
The petitioners state as follows:-
1. The above Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondents for violating the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 12.02.2019 in O.A.No. 530 of 2018, wherein an order of injunction was granted, protection to access of Lift, Car Park, Terrace, Community Hall, Super Market and Saloon area with Electronic Access Card and to the Meter Room, whenever an authorised person
Page 2 of 4
Cont.P.No.1704 of 2019
from the Electricity Board comes and to the DTH room, whenever an authorised person from the Cable Services comes and from interfering with the supply of Electricity, Water, DTH, Sewerage Treatment Plant, Security and House Keeping.
2 . At the time of passing the above order, the entire maintenance of the Flats was looked after by the respondents. Thereafter, during the pendency of the Contempt Petition, the respondents have left and the maintenance of the flats are looked after by the Royal Castle Association,consisting of the occupants of the flats and there is no hindrance whatsoever from the respondents.
3. The petitioners have also submitted a letter dated 30.08.2023 to their counsel to withdraw the Contempt Petition on that ground and the said letter is placed before this Hon'ble Court along with this Memo.
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN ,J.
Page 3 of 4
Cont.P.No.1704 of 2019
4. The petitioners accordingly pray that suitable orders be passed in the above Contempt Petition by dropping the same for the reasons stated above and thus render justice.
vsg
Dated at Chennai, on this, the 5th day of September, 2023.
Counsel for the petitioners”
2. In view of the same, no issue arises for adjudication. Hence, this Contempt Petition is closed.
vsg
21.09.2023
Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No
Contempt Petition No.1704 of 2019
Page 4 of 4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N.Shanmugam and S.Manjula
M/s. Amar Prakkash Developers Private Limited
A.Sudhir Kumar Surana
S.Aadarsh Kumar Surana
S.Aashish Surana
S.Kuldeep Surana
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
