Bakyarathi (deceased) v. the Government of Tamilnadu
Case brief
What is this about?
24183 of 2023 in W.A.No.24040 of 2023 THE…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.Nos.8922, 24180, 24183 of 2023 in W.A.No.24040 of 2023
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
Heard Mr.B.K.Girish Neelakantan, learned counsel for the applicants, Mrs.R.Anitha, learned Special Government Pleader for respondents 1 and 3 and Mr.J.Ravindran, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.D.R.Arunkumar, learned counsel for respondent 2.
The appeal is filed against the order of the learned Single Judge, dismissing the writ petition. There were six petitioners, wherein one of the petitioners has died and one legal heir of the deceased petitioner has also died.
Even otherwise, the appeal would be maintainable on behalf of the other petitioners.
In the light of that, these applications, seeking impleadment/accept the cause-title, stand allowed and are disposed of. Registry is directed to carryout the necessary amendments in the cause-title.
The legal heirs can be brought on record only to the extent of prosecuting the appeal.
drm
Coram
C.M. KARNAD, J.
D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court