The High Court allowed condonation of a 305-day delay in filing appeals under CRS Nos.13000 and 12999 of 2022, directing them to be listed for further proceedings.
The delay of 305 days in filing the appeals was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
C.M.P.Nos.3386 & 3389 of 2023 in W.A.SR.Nos.13000 & 12999 of 2023
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
Heard Mr.M.Vijay Anand, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr.B.Raghavulu Naidu, learned counsel for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the respondents opposes these applications on the ground that no sufficient cause is mentioned.
It appears that after the judgment was delivered by the learned Single Judge, the applicants had filed a review. The review was subsequently dismissed in January, 2022. Time was lost in proceeding with the review.
For the reasons stated in the respective accompanying affidavits, the delay of 305 days in filing the appeals is condoned. Accordingly, these applications stand allowed and are disposed of.
List the appeals on 22.01.2024.
drm
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing appeals should be condoned.
The Chief Justice
D Bharatha Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
