The High Court condones a delay of 169 days in filing an appeal, finding the reasons stated in the supporting affidavit satisfactory and the respondent having no objection.
The petritions is allowed, the delay of 169 days is condoned, and the appeal may be numbered if otherwise in order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.16755 of 2022 in
W.A.No.SR103085 of 2022
R.MAHADEVAN,J. AND
J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.
This Petition is filed by the
petitioners / appellants seeking to condone the delay of 169 days in filing the above appeal.
2.Heard both sides. The learned
Counsel appearing for the respondent has no serious objection for ordering this petition.
stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition and being satisfied with the
same, the delay is condoned and this petition is accordingly, ordered.
(R.M.D.,J.) (J.S.N.P.,J.) 11.01.2023
ay
Note: Registry is directed to number the
Writ Appeal if it is otherwise in order.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 169 days in filing the appeal should be condoned.
Petitioners / Appellants
Respondent
R. MAHADEVAN
J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
