Disposed

M/S.Southern Brothers Cuisine Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S.Bhimas Drive Inn Pvt. Ltd.

Madras HC10 Jan 2023OSA/184/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras disposed of two Original Side Appeals filed to set aside an interim order. Since the underlying original applications were subsequently dismissed for non-compliance and lack of arbitration initiation, the court held no further adjudication was needed but granted liberty to seek remedy elsewhere.

What did the court decide?

Original Side Appeals disposed of with liberty to work out remedy before appropriate forum; no costs; connected Miscellaneous Petitions closed.

M/S.Southern Brothers Cuisine Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S.Bhimas Drive Inn… — Arbitration | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

O.S.A.Nos.184 & 185 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 10.01.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

¶7

O.S.A.Nos.184 & 185 of 2020 and

¶8

C.M.P.Nos.9526 & 9530 of 2020

¶9

M/s.Southern Brothers Cuisine Pvt.Ltd., Represented by its Director Mr.D.Santhanam, Ground Floor, Pinacle International Tech Park, CSIR Road, Taramani, Chennai 600 113. ...Appellant in both the appeals

¶10

¶11

1.M/s.Bhimas Drive Inn Pvt. Ltd., No.6, South Perumal Street, Vadapalani, Chennai – 600 026.

¶12

2.M/s.Tidel Park Limited No.4, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Taramani, Chennai – 600 034. ... Respondents in both the appeals.

¶13

Page 1 of 4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

O.S.A.Nos.184 & 185 of 2020

¶16

COMMON PRAYER: Original Side Appeals filed under Order 36 Rule 9 of Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent & Section 37 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 praying to set aside the Order dated 06.08.2020 made in O.A.Nos.1118 & 1119 of 2019 on the file of this Court.

¶17

For Appellant : Mr.M.Baskar.

¶18

For Respondents : No appearance for R1. Mr.G.Saravanan for R2.

¶19

C O M M O N J U D G M E N T [Judgment of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN,J,]

¶20

These Original Side Appeals have been filed to set aside the interim order dated 06.08.2020 passed by the learned Judge in O.A.Nos.1118 & 1119 of 2019.

¶21

2.When these matters were taken up for consideration, the learned

¶22

counsel for the appellant submitted that subsequent to the filing of these Original Side Appeals, the Original Applications themselves came to be dismissed on 01.09.2020 with the following observations:

¶23

“5.In such view of the matter, as the applicant has not complied with the orders passed by this Court and dragging on the matters and these applications are pending from the year 2019 seeking for interim measures

¶24

Page 2 of 4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

O.S.A.Nos.184 & 185 of 2020

¶27

and till date, the applicant have not informed this Court whether the proceedings for arbitration have been initiated or not, this Court is of the view that these applications for interim measures cannot be kept pending endlessly. Accordingly, these applications are dismissed.”

¶28

Therefore, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that nothing

¶29

survives for further adjudication in these appeals.

¶30

3.In view of the above, these Original Side Appeals are disposed of, granting liberty to the parties to work out their remedy before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶31

(R.M.D.,J.) (J.S.N.P.,J.) 10.01.2023

¶32

¶33

Index:Yes / No Speaking Order / Non-speaking Order Neutral Citation: Yes / No

¶34

Page 3 of 4

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

O.S.A.Nos.184 & 185 of 2020

¶37

R.MAHADEVAN,J. and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.

¶38

¶39

O.S.A.Nos.184 & 185 of 2020 and C.M.P.Nos.9526 & 9530 of 2020

¶40

Dated:10.01.2023

¶41

Page 4 of 4

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M/S.Southern Brothers Cuisine Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S.Bhimas Drive Inn Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Southern Brothers Cuisine Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S.Bhimas Drive Inn Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Balaiyan, Vs Thiru. v. Balaji

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs R.Baskaran

Government of Tamil Nadu Vs M. Selvakumaran

R.Geetha Vs Government of Tamilnadu

Dr.N.Padmanaban Vs The Secretary to the Government

T.Sankararaghavan Vs The Chief Engineer/Personnel