The High Court considered an application to file an appeal in a writ petition involving property rights between an applicant and the Housing Board. The court found a prima facie case for leave to appeal and disposed of the interim application to allow the appeal.
Leave to file an appeal against the impugned order was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.12217 of 2023 in W.A.No.SR 74860 of 2023
C.M.P.No.12217 of 2023
in
W.A.No.SR 74860 of 2023
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and
P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
We have heard Mr.Mukund, learned Senior Counsel for the applicant, Dr.A.Thiagarajan, learned Senior Counsel for the writ petitioners and Mr.Veeraraghavan, learned counsel for the Housing Board.
_________ Page 1 of 3_
C.M.P.No.12217 of 2023 in W.A.No.SR 74860 of 2023
appeal against the impugned order. The application is allowed and disposed of.
kpl
_________ Page 2 of 3_
C.M.P.No.12217 of 2023 in W.A.No.SR 74860 of 2023
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.
(kpl)
C.M.P.No.12217 of 2023 in W.A.No.SR 74860 of 2023
11.07.2023
_________ Page 3 of 3_
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant has made out a case for grant of leave to appeal.
Whether the ruling can be deferred to the merits of the substantive appeal.
Housing Board
Applicant
Writ Petitioners
The Hon'ble Chief Justice
P.D. Auidikesavalu, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
