This court dismissed an application seeking condonation of a 3976-day delay to restore an appeal that was previously dismissed for non-appearance. The court rejected the petitioner's affidavit reasons as insufficient and unrealistic.
Petition for condonation of delay of 3976 days to restore the appeal was not allowed due to unacceptability of the pleaded reasons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.11814 of 2022 in A.S.No.908 of 2004
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 3976 days in filing the petition for restoration to restore the appeal in A.S.No.908 of 2004.
Page 1 of 3
06.12.2023
mn
Page 2 of 3
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
mn
C.M.P.No.11814 of 2022 in A.S.No.908 of 2004
06.12.2023
Page 3 of 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 3976 days in filing a petition for restoration of an appeal can be condoned.
Whether the reasons pleaded in the affidavit for non-appearance at the hearing prior to this filing justify condonation of time.
Petitioner
Respondent
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
