Arul Jose Kennady v. Marry Bindu
Case brief
What is this about?
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.A.(MD).No.473 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 17.04.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
C.M.A(MD)No.473 of 2017
Arul Jose Kennady
..... Appellant/ Respondent
-vs-
Marry Bindu ... Respondent / Petitioner
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 55 of Indian Divorce Act, 1869, as against the fair and decretal order dated 18.03.2017 made in D.O.P.No.488 of 2015 by dismissing the D.O.P setting the appellant ex-parte filed by the respondent herein under Sections 10(1) (x) of Indian Divorce Act, 1869, to dissolve the marriage between the petitioner and respondent solemnized on 10.05.2000 passed by the learned District Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.
For Appellant : Mr.J.Sankara Pandian
For Respondent : No appearance
1/3
C.M.A.(MD).No.473 of 2017
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the appellant is not ready to argue the matter.
Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for default. There shall
be no order as to costs.
17.04.2023
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi
To
1. The District Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.
2. The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
2/3
C.M.A.(MD).No.473 of 2017
R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.
ebsi
C.M.A.(MD)No.473 of 2017
17.04.2023
3/3
Arul Jose Kennady
Marry Bindu
R.Vijayakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court