Dismissed

The Manager v. M.Selvakumar

Madras HC10 Jun 2023CMA/934/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court recorded a settlement reached in a motor accident compensation appeal before the High Court Legal Services Committee Lok Adalat. The insurers and claimants agreed to settle the award for Rs.8,25,000/- with deposit terms, closing the connected petition, and ordered refund of court fees.

What did the court decide?

The connected miscellaneous petition closed upon deposit of the settlement amount; court fees refunded to appellant.

The Manager Vs M.Selvakumar — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

C.M.A.No.934 of 2023

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI Saturday, the 10^th day of June 2023 NATIONAL LOK ADALAT AWARD (Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987)

¶3

Presided over by

¶4

The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and

¶5

Member :

¶6

Mr. R.Paranjothi (Retd.D.J.) Mr. K.P.P.Raja Raja Chozhan (Advocate)

¶7

C.M.A.No.934 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.8571 of 2023

¶8

(Appeal against the Judgment and Decree dated 15.12.2022 made in M.C.O.P. No.4005 of 2018 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Cuddalore).

¶9

The Manager, Tata AIG General Insurance Company Limited, 2^nd Floor, Samson Towers, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.

¶10

... Appellant / Respondent No.II

¶11

Versus

¶12

M.Selvakumar ... Respondent / Petitioner

¶13

K.Prabhu ... Respondent / Respondent No.I

¶14

1/5

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

C.M.A.No.934 of 2023

¶17

This case came up for settlement before the Lok Adalat. M/s.Gopalan Associates and M.B.Raghavan, learned counsel for the appellant. After mutual discussion and negotiation between both parties they arrived at a compromise to settle the matter as follows:

¶18

TERMS OF SETTLEMENT

¶19

Both the parties voluntarily have come to the settlement before the Lok Adalat as follows :

¶20

(i) As against the award amount of Rs.9,10,070/- with further interest, the parties have agreed to settle for a sum of Rs.8,25,000/- as full quit;

¶21

(ii) It is represented that 50% of the award amount has already been deposited which is lying to the credit of M.C.O.P in the Trial Court and the balance sum shall be deposited within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order;

¶22

(iii) Upon such deposit, the claimant(s) is / are entitled to withdraw the entire sum without any formal application and only upon verification of the identity. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶23

The Manager, Tata AIG General Insurance Company Limited, 2^nd Floor, Samson Towers, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. Counsel for the Appellant

¶24

M.Selvakumar

¶25

K.Prabhu Counsel for the Respondents

¶26

2/5

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

C.M.A.No.934 of 2023

¶29

This Lok Adalat award is passed in terms of the above

¶30

settlement.

¶31

The full court fee paid shall be refunded to the appellant in the manner provided under Section 71-A of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and suits Valuation Act, 1955 and the Court Fees Act, 1870 as provided for under sub Sec.1 of Section 2 r/w 25 of LSA Act 1987 as amended in 1994.

Judge

Member

Member

To: The parties/Advocate concerned

¶36

Copy to:

¶37

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Cuddalore.

¶38

The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai.

¶39

The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras.

¶40

The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, High Court Madras. +2 copies

¶41

vga/grs

¶42

3/5

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

C.M.A.No.934 of 2023

¶45

4/5

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

C.M.A.No.934 of 2023

¶48

D.Bharatha Chakravarthy,J.

vga/grs

C.M.A.934 of 2023

10.06.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶53

5/5

The Manager v. M.Selvakumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Manager v. M.Selvakumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Cloude Vs Justin Hiruthayaraj

The Special Tahsildr Vs Gangatharan (Died)

E. Anandan Vs M. Madanraj

K.Mani Vs D.Umapathi

Tata Aig General Insurance Company Limited Vs K.Arul

The Chief Manager Vs Kirubarani