K.Meenakumari, v. G.Kalidass
Case brief
What is this about?
First Appeal under Order XLI Rule 1 & 2 CPC read with Section 96 CPC dismissed as non-prosecution due to absence of instructions from the appellant on the date of hearing.
What did the court decide?
The First Appeal is dismissed as Non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
What the court decided
A.S.(MD)No.226 of 2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 14.12.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
A.S.(MD)No.226 of 2015
1.K.Meenakumari
2.K.Venkatesan
... Appellants
Vs.
G.Kalidass
... Respondent
PRAYER: First Appeal filed under Order XLI Rule 1 & 2 read with Section 96 of C.P.C., to set aside the decree and the judgment dated 06.01.2014 rendered in O.S.No.156 of 2012 on the file of the VI Additional District Judge, Madurai.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.Meenakumari
- appellant
K.Venkatesan
- respondent
G.Kalidass
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court