Syed Sabiya v. Bathur Jaman
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for leave to file a reply statement based on a document titled Marz-ul-Mauth was allowed by the court as sufficient cause was shown, with directions to the Registry to receive the reply statement.
What did the court decide?
Allow the application and direct the Registry to receive the reply statement. List the matter for further hearing.
What the court decided
A.No.377 of 2023
A.No.377 of 2023 in C.S.No.174 of 2019
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
The plaintiffs have presented this application for leave to file a reply statement in response to the written statement. In the affidavit in support of this application, it is stated that the defendants have made factual allegations with regard to their entitlement to the suit properties on the basis of a document, namely, "Marz-ul-Mauth". In view thereof, it is stated that it is necessary to file a reply statement. On instructions, learned counsel for the defendants states that he has no objection to this application being allowed.
- Upon examining the affidavit in support of this application and being satisfied that sufficient cause is shown, this application is allowed. Consequently, the Registry is directed to receive the reply statement.
- List the matter on 16.02.2023.
02.02.2023
rna
1/2
Coram
DENIS FELIX SENNILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court