Court allowed plaintiffs' application to file a reply to the written statement after satisfying itself that sufficient cause was shown and the matter is listed for future proceedings.
Permission to file the reply statement of the plaintiffs is granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.589 of 2023
A.No.589 of 2023 in C.S.No.45 of 2021
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
The plaintiffs have presented this application for permission to file a reply to the written statement. On instructions, learned counsel for the third defendant submits that he has no objection to this application being allowed. In the affidavit in support of this application, it is stated that it is necessary to file a reply statement in view of the numerous defences raised in the written statement. On examining the affidavit and being satisfied that sufficient cause is shown, this application is allowed. Consequently, the Registry is directed to receive the reply statement of the plaintiffs.
09.02.2023
rna
1/2
A.No.589 of 2023
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
rna
A.No.589 of 2023 in C.S.No.45 of 2021
09.02.2023
2/2
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
