The court extended the mandate of the arbitral tribunal by three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, as the second respondent had no objection to the application.
Extension of the mandate of the arbitral tribunal by three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.31 of 2023
A.No.31 of 2023
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
The applicant seeks an extension of the mandate of the arbitral tribunal. Learned counsel submits that oral arguments were concluded and that written arguments have also been submitted to the tribunal. On instructions, learned counsel for the first respondent submits that he has no objection to this application being allowed.
09.02.2023 (3/3)
rna
1/2
A.No.31 of 2023
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
rna
A.No.31 of 2023
09.02.2023
2/2
Applicant
First Respondent
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
