The single judge allowed an application to mark additional documents subject to admissibility, relevancy, and proof, and directed the plaintiff to implead the legal heirs of the deceased first defendant.
Application to mark additional documents allowed subject to proof; impleadment of legal heirs of deceased first defendant directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.3423 of 2023 in C.S No.68 of 2013
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
This application has been filed by the applicant/plaintiff to permit him to mark the additional documents listed in the schedule to the Judges summon in evidence.
11.07.2023
uma
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to permit the applicant to mark additional documents as listed in the schedule.
Whether to direct impleadment of legal heirs of the deceased first defendant.
Applicant/Plaintiff
Respondents 1 & 2
A.A.Nakkiran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
