Allowed

M/s.Mercedes-Benz Financial Services India Private Limited v. M/s.Century Super Speciality Hospitals Private Limited, Rep. by its Director

Madras HC6 Mar 2023A/199/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court, on the application for extension of arbitrator treat mandate, decided to appoint a new sole arbitrator instead of extending the existing mandate, directing the new arbitrator to conclude proceedings within one year.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Mr. S. Muthucharan as the new sole arbitrator.

What the court decided

M/s.Mercedes-Benz Financial Services India Private Limited Vs… — Arbitration | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Application No.199 of 2022

¶2

Application No.199 of 2022

¶3

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

¶4

This application is filed to extend the mandate of the sole Arbitrator by a period of 12 months from the date of receipt of copy of order for the purpose of completing the arbitration proceedings in Arbitration Case DFS No.214 of 2018.

¶5

Heard Mr.D.Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant

¶6

and Mr.B.Lokesh Sundaram, learned counsel of M/S.Nathan and Associates (Law Firm) for the respondents.

¶7

Learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submits that

¶8

the arbitral proceedings could not be completed within the time prescribed at the instance of the applicant since there was a delay in filing the claim statement and proof affidavit before the learned Arbitrator. Therefore, the learned counsel for the applicant seeks extension of the mandate of the Arbitrator.

¶9

1/4

¶10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶11

Application No.199 of 2022

¶12

However, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent seeks change of Arbitrator. But the learned counsel for the applicant would submit that there is no ground made out for change of Arbitrator. The learned counsel for the respondent would submit that since the applicant appointed the Arbitrator unilaterally, in the interest of justice, this Court may appoint a new Arbitrator to enable the parties to resolve the dispute before him. Learned counsel for the applicant after noticing that the appointment of the Arbitrator was unilateral, he has also fairly accepted for appointment of new Arbitrator.

¶13

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court is inclined to appoint new Arbitrator.

¶14

i) Accordingly, Mr.S.Muthuchharan, Advocate, Enrl. No.2892 of 2018, No.244, Ragendra Garden, Vettuvankanni, Chennai – 600 041, Mobile No.7397261623 is appointed as sole Arbitrator to enter upon reference and adjudicate the disputes inter se the parties.

¶15

ii) The learned Arbitrator appointed herein, shall after issuing notice to the parties and upon hearing

¶16

2/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Application No.199 of 2022

¶19

them, pass an award, within a period of one year from the date of receipt of the order.

¶20

iii) The Arbitrator is directed to fix the fee based on the present claim amount that is going to be filed by the applicant / claimant and the same shall be borne by the parties equally. In the event of non-appearance of the respondents, the applicant shall bear the entire remuneration and other expenses and thereafter, recover the same directly from the respondents.

¶21

This Application is ordered accordingly, leaving the parties to bear their own costs. Since this Court has appointed an Arbitrator, it is open to the applicant as well as the respondents to seek other reliefs under the provisions of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 before the Arbitrator.

¶22

06.03.2023

¶23

AT Note: Issue order copy on 13.03.2023

¶24

3/4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

Application No.199 of 2022

¶27

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

¶28

¶29

Application No.199 of 2022

¶30

06.03.2023

¶31

4/4

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M/s.Mercedes-Benz Financial Services India Private Limited v. M/s.Century Super Speciality Hospitals Private Limited, Rep. by its Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

M/s.Mercedes-Benz Financial Services India Private Limited v. M/s.Century Super Speciality Hospitals Private Limited, Rep. by its Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Marg Ltd. Vs M/S.South India Corporation Agencies Ltd. and 23 Others

The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation Vs the Official Liquidator, High Court of Madras

Marg Ltd. Vs M/s.South India Corporation Agencies Ltd. and 23 others

M/s.Mercedes-Benz Financial Services India Private Limited Vs M/s.Century Super Speciality Hospitals Private Limited, Rep. by its Director

M/s.Mercedes-Benz Financial Services India Private Limited Vs M/s.Century Super Speciality Hospitals Private Limited, Rep. by its Director

M/s.Mercedes-Benz Financial Services India Private Limited Vs M/s.Century Super Speciality Hospitals Private Limited, Rep. by its Director