In this composite challenge to suspension and charge memos, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court observed that since the charge memos were independently challenged, no order on suspension was required, dismissing the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.9791 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 08.09.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
W.P(MD)No.9791 of 2022 and
W.M.P(MD)Nos.7008 & 7010 of 2022
T.Rajendran
... Petitioner
Vs
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of impugned charge memo and suspension order in Letter No.3605/A1/2020, dated 02.05.2022 issued by the second respondent against the petitioner and quash the same as illegal further directing the second respondent to allow the petitioner to retire from his service with consequent benefits.
1/4
W.P(MD)No.9791 of 2022
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai For Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah For Respondents : Mr.S.R.A.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel on either side.
08.09.2022
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No mga
2/4
W.P(MD)No.9791 of 2022
To
W.P(MD)No.9791 of 2022
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
mga
W.P.(MD)No.9791 of 2022
08.09.2022
T.Rajendran
The Deputy Inspector General of Registration
The District Registrar
G.R.Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
