Allowed

The Secretary v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC7 Sept 2022WP(MD)/17989/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition challenged the denial of a Physical Education Teacher post by the Director of School Education. The Madras High Court held that the school met the strength criteria under G.O.No.525 (1997) and directed the respondent to sanction the post while accepting the surrender of the existing Sewing Teacher post.

What did the court decide?

The Director of School Education directed to sanction a post of Physical Education Teacher accepting the surrender of the Sewing Teacher post.

The Secretary Vs the State of Tamil Nadu — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.17989 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Dated: 07.09.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.17989 of 2019 and

¶7

W.M.P(MD).Nos.14446 and 14447 of 2019

¶8

The Secretary Vaniga Vaisya Sanga High School, Sankarankovil 627 756 Tirunelveli District. ... Petitioner

¶9

¶10

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep., by its Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

¶11

2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai 600 006.

¶12

3.The Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

¶13

4.The District Educational Officer, Sankarankovil, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order issued by the second respondent Director of School Education in Mu.Mu.No.056138/D2/E3/2018 dated 28.01.2019 quash the same and further direct the second respondent Director of

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.(MD)No.17989 of 2019

¶17

School Education to permit the conversion of the existing post of Sewing Instructor into Physical Education Teacher.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Ragatheesh Kumar for M/s.Isaac Chambers For Respondents : Mr.S.Shaji Bino Special Government Pleader

¶19

ORDER

¶20

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶21

2.The writ petitioner is an aided Educational Institution. It is run

¶22

by a registered society. The School was initially established as a middle School in the year 1958. It was upgraded as High School in 1996. At present, 364 students are studying in the School. The petitioner has among others a sanctioned post of Sewing Teacher also. The petitioner applied to the second respondent for converting the post of Sewing Teacher into that of Physical Education Teacher. The said request was denied by the impugned order dated 28.01.2019. Challenging the same, this writ petition has been filed.

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.(MD)No.17989 of 2019

¶25

3.The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner reiterated all the contentions set out in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition and called upon this Court to quash the impugned order and grant the relief prayed for.

¶26

4.Per contra, the learned Special Government Pleader submitted that it is not possible to convert the post of Sewing Teacher into that of Physical Education Teacher and called upon this Court to sustain the impugned order.

¶27

5.I carefully considered the rival contentions and went through the materials on record. There is no dispute that G.O.(Ms).No.525, School Education Department dated 29.12.1997 is still holding the field. Clause III (c) of the said Government Order states that, when the strength in classes VI to X in High School exceeds 250, one post of Physical Education Teacher will be sanctioned. Though the writ petitioner has class up to 10^th standard, Class IX and X come under the self financing scheme, only classes VI to VIII are come under the aided category.

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P.(MD)No.17989 of 2019

¶30

6.The student' strength as on date in classes VI to VIII comes to 364. Therefore, they are very much entitled to sanction of one post of Physical Education Teacher. As on date, no such post has been sanctioned. I therefore suggested to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that they can surrender the existing post of Sewing Teacher. After getting instructions, the learned counsel states that if the School will be sanctioned with one post of Physical Education Teacher, they have no objection for surrendering the Sewing Teacher' post. As a result, the Government will not be put to any financial loss.

¶31

7.Since the petitioner is entitled to the sanction of post of Physical Education Teacher as per G.O.(Ms).No.525, School Education Department, dated 29.12.1997, the second respondent is directed to forthwith sanction a post of Physical Education Teacher for the petitioner School. Even while sanctioning the said post, the proceedings sanctioning the post of Physical Education Teacher will also accept the surrender of the post of Sewing Teacher. The petitioner is directed to submit a proposal for surrendering the post of Sewing Teacher forthwith. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

W.P.(MD)No.17989 of 2019

¶34

8.The Writ Petition stands allowed on these terms. No costs.

¶35

Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶36

07.09.2022

¶37

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Rmk

¶38

¶39

1.The Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

¶40

2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai 600 006.

¶41

3.The Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

¶42

4.The District Educational Officer, Sankarankovil, Tirunelveli District.

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

W.P.(MD)No.17989 of 2019

¶45

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.,

¶46

Rmk

¶47

W.P.(MD)No.17989 of 2019

¶48

07.09.2022

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

The Secretary v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Secretary v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Velu.K Vs The Government of Tamilnadu

Rajahs Higher Secondary School Vs The Chief Educational Officer

Sheela Devi.S Vs The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies

Uma.T Vs the Chief Manager

Dr. Ravi .O Vs The Director of Collegiate Education

Immanuel Gnanasekaran .M Vs The District Collector