A writ petition filed under Article 226 for a drinking water connection was dismissed for default due to the non-appearance of the petitioner on the dates of listing, resulting in the closure of the connected miscellaneous petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD).No.9518 of 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 14.06.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
W.P.(MD).No.9518 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011
Glory ... Petitioner
Vs.
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the fourth respondent to grant drinking water supply service connection to the petitioner in the fourth respondent panchayat by following the seniority list dated 27.07.2009 prepared for the said purpose by the third respondent.
For Petitioner : No appearance For R1 & R2 : Mr.N.Muthuvijayan Special Government Pleader For R3 : Mr.S.Bharathi For R4 : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar
1/2
W.P.(MD).No.9518 of 2011
ORDER
There was no representation on the side of the petitioner on 13.06.2022. Hence, the matter is listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
// True Copy //
/06/2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
jbr
To
2/2
Glory
District Collector/Inspector of Panchayat Thoothukudi
Assistant Director of Panchayat, Thoothukudi
Block Development Officer (Panchayat), Thenthiruperai
President, Mookuperi Village Panchayat
R. Vijayakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
