Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari and mandamus to quash a communication and direct authorities to grant possession of leased land. The court dismissed the petition for default due to the absence of the petitioner.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD).No.10523 of 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 13.06.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
W.P.(MD).No.10523 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011
Y.Sathianesan
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Chief Secretariat, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai-9. 2.The Secretary to Government, Forest Department, Chief Secretariat, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai-9. 3.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Panagal Buildings, Saidapet, Chennai. 4.The District Forest Officer, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil. 5.The Ex-Servicemen, Land Colonization Co-operative Society Limited, No.2784/1948, Kulasekharam, Kanyakumari District. 6.Lucas 7.Susai 8.S.Rajaian
1/3
W.P.(MD).No.10523 of 2011
9.Ayya Pillai 10.Krishnan
11.Thalian
... Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned communication bearing No.18907/Ni.Mu.2.2/98-25, dated 01.03.2001 and quash the same and consequently direct the second and third respondents and put the fourth respondent in possession of the 500 acres of leased out land in the petitioner's representation, dated 02.04.2007.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For R-1 to R-4 : Mr.P.Thilakkumar Government Pleader for Mr.M.Ramesh Government Advocate
ORDER
There was no representation on the side of the petitioner. Hence, the matter is listed today under the caption "For Dismissal". Even today, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Therefore, the present Writ Petition stands dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
// True Copy //
/07/2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
Nsr
To
1.The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Chief Secretariat, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai-9.
2/3
W.P.(MD).No.10523 of 2011
2.The Secretary to Government, Forest Department, Chief Secretariat, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai-9. 3.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Panagal Buildings, Saidapet, Chennai. 4.The District Forest Officer, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.
+1 CC to M/s.T.LAJAPATHI ROY, Advocate ( SR-25498[F] dated 14/06/2022 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP. ( SR-25596[F] dated 14/06/2022 ) W.P.(MD).No.10523 of 2011 RD(01.07.2022) 3P 7C
W.P.(MD).No.10523 of 2011 13.06.2022
3/3
Y.Sathianesan
Secretary to Government, Revenue Department
Secretary to Government, Forest Department
Principal Chief Conservator of Forests
District Forest Officer, Kanyakumari District
Ex-Servicemen, Land Colonization Co-operative Society Limited
R.Vijayakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
