Dismissed

S.K. Senthilkumaran, v. the State Rep. by Its

Madras HC22 Dec 2022WP(MD)/15056/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by S.K.Senthilkumaran against the State, Deputy Registrar of Chits, and Margadharsi Chits Ltd. was dismissed for non-prosecution as there was no appearance by the petitioner on the hearing dates.

What did the court decide?

None granted; petition dismissed for non-prosecution with connected miscellaneous petition closed.

S.K. Senthilkumaran, Vs the State Rep. by Its — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.15056 of 2012

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED :22.12.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. KUMARESH BABU

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.15056 of 2012

¶7

and

¶8

M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2012

¶9

S.K.Senthilkumaran ... Petitioner

¶10

Vs.

¶11

1.The State Rep by it's Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu Commercial Taxes and Registration (G) Department,

¶12

Fort St.George, Chennai-9.

¶13

2.The Deputy Registrar of Chits, Trichy.

¶14

3.Margadharsi Chits (P) Ltd., Rep by its Foreman C.Sivasankar,

¶15

1^st Floor, Tab Complex,

¶16

41, Bharadhidasan Salai, Contonment, Trichy 620001. ... Respondents

¶17

PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order bearing G.O.(D).No.445 dated 03.10.2012 passed by the 1^st respondent and quash the same and direct the 1^st respondent to remit the ACD.No.585 of 2007 back to the file of the 2^nd respondent for fresh disposal.

¶18

Page 1 of 4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.(MD)No.15056 of 2012

¶21

For Petitioner :No appearance For Respondents :Ms.D.Farjana Ghowshia Special Government Pleader for R1 & R2 :No appearance for R3

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

The writ petition was listed for hearing on 19.12.2022. As there

¶24

was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the same was listed for dismissal.

¶25

2.Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

¶26

Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

¶27

22.12.2022

¶28

Index : Yes / No Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order sbn

¶29

Page 2 of 4

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

W.P.(MD)No.15056 of 2012

¶32

¶33

1.The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu Commercial Taxes and Registration (G) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-9.

¶34

2.The Deputy Registrar of Chits, Trichy.

¶35

3.Margadharsi Chits (P) Ltd., Foreman C.Sivasankar,

¶36

1^st Floor, Tab Complex, 41, Bharadhidasan Salai, Contonment, Trichy 620001.

¶37

Page 3 of 4

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

W.P.(MD)No.15056 of 2012

¶40

K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

¶41

sbn

¶42

W.P.(MD)No.15056 of 2012 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2012

¶43

22.12.2022

¶44

Page 4 of 4

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.K. Senthilkumaran, v. the State Rep. by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.K. Senthilkumaran, v. the State Rep. by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Suresh Vs the District Collector

Thirumal Vs the District Collector

D.Ramesh Vs the District Revenue Officer

Dr. N. David Vs the District Collector

Devi Vs the District Revenue Officer

Sundar Raj, Vs the Director (Enforcement)