In a writ petition under Article 226 seeking directions to respondents to survey the petitioner's land, the Court was satisfied that the land survey was already completed by the Tahsildar and disposed of the petition without granting further relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED 13.09.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
W.P(MD)No.8148 of 2021
Mohamed Yasararafath
..Petitioner
Vs
5.Pramasivam, The Survey Officer, Kamuthi, Kamuthi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.
..Respondents.
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to take appropriate action against the fifth respondent as per the guidelines given by this Court in W.P(MD)No.11228 of 2022 based on the
2
Petitioner's representation, dated 27.3.2021 and consequently to direct the fifth respondent to survey the land in patta No.453 comprised in Survey No.GRS 606/1291 measuring 5 cents situated at Dharga Road, Kamuthi Town, Kamuthi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.
For Petitioner :Mr.K.Sathish Kumar
For Respondents :Mr.C.Satheesh 1 to 4 Government Advocate
For Respondent-5 :Served
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to take appropriate action against the fifth respondent as per the guidelines given by this Court in W.P(MD)No.11228 of 2022 based on the Petitioner's representation, dated 27.3.2021 and consequently to direct the fifth respondent to survey the land in patta No.453 comprised in Survey No.GRS 606/1291 measuring 5 cents situated at Dharga Road, Kamuthi Town, Kamuthi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.
2.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court.
3.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 submitted a
3
communication sent by the fourth Respondent/Tahsildar,Kamuthi, Kamuthi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District, dated 7.9.2021 and had stated that after holding an enquiry, the Petitioner's land has been surveyed by the authorities concerned mentioning the four boundaries of the said land, which was also acknowledged by the Petitioner through his endorsement dated 26.7.2021.
costs.
13.09.2022
Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes/No vsn
To
4
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN,J
vsn
ORDER MADE IN
W.P(MD)No.8148 of 2021
13.09.2022
5
6
7
8
9
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohamed Yasararafath
The District Collector, Ramanathapuram
The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi
The Tahsildar, Kamuthi
Pramasivam
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
