The Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Ruby Chlorates Private Limited seeking to quash an order rejecting a request for power cut exemption. The court noted the absence of any representation from the petitioner and recorded the respondent's submission regarding power deficit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD).No.6196 of 2010
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 13.07.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
W.P.(MD).No.6196 of 2010 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2010
Ruby Chlorates Private Limited, No.11-B, Swaminatha Sastry Street, Tennur, Trichirappalli-620 017, Represented by its Managing Director, Mr.D.Baskaran
... Petitioner
Vs.
The Superintending Engineer, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, TEDC-Metro, Trichy. ... Respondent
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the respondent in his proceedings Lr.No.SE/TEDC/M/Try/AEE/AE/GL/ F.R&C/D.No.304/2010, dated 26.04.2010 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondent to grant exemption from power cut for a further period of 2 months to the petitioner's company.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel
1/4
W.P.(MD).No.6196 of 2010
ORDER
The present Writ Petition has been filed to quash the order of the respondent Electricity Board, dated 26.04.2010, under which, the request of the petitioner seeking exemption from power cut for a further period of six months was rejected.
Board submits that in view of the power deficit during the said period, this order came to be passed. But, nothing survives in the writ petition. There is no representation on the side of the petitioner. The said statement of the learned Standing Counsel for the Electricity Board is recorded.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
13.07.2022
2/4
W.P.(MD).No.6196 of 2010
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No btr
To
The Superintending Engineer, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, TEDC-Metro, Trichy.
3/4
W.P.(MD).No.6196 of 2010
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
btr
Order made in W.P.(MD).No.6196 of 2010
13.07.2022
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the request for exemption from power cut should be set aside in the absence of any representation from the petitioner.
Ruby Chlorates Private Limited
The Superintending Engineer, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, TEDC-Metro, Trichy
R.VIJAYAKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
