The writ petition was dismissed for default because the petitioner failed to appear or provide representation on two consecutive listing dates before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD).No.12074 of 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 12.07.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
W.P.(MD).No.12074 of 2012 and
M.P(MD)No.1 of 2012
Sundaramani ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Dindigul, Dindigul District.
2.The Tahsildar, Natham Taluk, Dindigul District. 3.The District Forest Officer, Dindigul District. ... Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the second respondent in his proceedings Oo.Moo. 8099/12/A4 dated 14.08.2012 and quash the same.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.P.Thambi Durai Government Advocate
1/3
W.P.(MD).No.12074 of 2012
ORDER
There was no representation on the side of the writ petitioner on 07.07.2022. Hence, the matter is listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation on the side of the writ petitioner.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
12.07.2022
gbg
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No
To
2/3
W.P.(MD).No.12074 of 2012
R.VIJAYAKUMAR ,J.
gbg
Order made in W.P.(MD).No.12074 of 2012
12.07.2022
3/3
Sundaramani
The District Collector, Dindigul
The Tahsildar, Natham Taluk
The District Forest Officer, Dindigul
R.VIJAYAKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
