Disposed

Vallinayagam K v. the Commissioner

Madras HC24 Feb 2022WP(MD)/3510/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This short order in a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India disposed of the matter by directing the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's application on merits within 30 days based on the General Pleader's undertaking.

What did the court decide?

Direction to 1st respondent to consider petitioner's application dated 15.02.2022 on merits and pass decision within 30 days.

Vallinayagam K Vs the Commissioner — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.3510 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.02.2022 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.(MD) No.3510 of 2022

¶4

K.Vallinayagam ... Petitioner

¶5

/vs./

¶6

1.The Commissioner,

¶7

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment, No.19, Uthamar Gandhi Street, Numgampakkam, Chennai.

¶8

2.The Joint Commissioner,

¶9

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment, Near Palayamkottai,

¶10

Bus Stand,

¶11

Tirunelveli District.

¶12

The Executive Officer,

¶13

Arulmigu Thenkarai Maha Rajeswarar Temple, Sithur, Tirunelveli District.

¶14

... Respondents

¶15

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1^st respondent to accept the petitioner's application dated 15.02.2022.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Subash Babu

¶17

For R1 & R2 : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus directing the 1^st respondent to accept the petitioner's application dated 15.02.2022.

¶20

2.The learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents 1 and 2 submits that the application filed by the petitioner dated 15.02.2022 will be considered on merits and appropriate decision will be taken on the same.

¶21

3.This writ petition is disposed of, in terms of the above undertaking given by the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents 1 and 2. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is needless to state that the petitioner shall also https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

1/2

¶23

W.P.(MD) No.3510 of 2022

¶24

be heard before passing such orders. No costs.

¶25

Sd/Assistant Registrar (AD I) // True Copy //

¶26

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶27

mm To

¶28

1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment, No.19, Uthamar Gandhi Street, Numgampakkam, Chennai. 2.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment, Near Palayamkottai, Bus Stand, Tirunelveli District.

¶29

+1 CC to M/s.M.SUBASH BABU, Advocate ( SR-8551[F] dated 24/02/2022 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-8683[F] dated 25/02/2022 )

¶30

W.P.(MD)No.3510 of 2022 24.02.2022

¶31

MGJ(17.03.2022) 2P 5C

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

2/2

Vallinayagam K v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vallinayagam K v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Elambarithi Vs the Commissioner

Nagarajan .P Vs the Joint Commissioner

Muthukrishnan.M.R Vs the Commissioner

Subbiah.T.R Vs the Inspector General of Registration

Parasuraman M Vs the Joint Commissioner

Natarajan K.S.R Vs the Commissioner