Disposed

Muthukrishnan.M.R v. the Commissioner

Madras HC23 Feb 2022WP(MD)/3345/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Common order disposing of six writ petitions filed under Article 226 seeking certiorari to quash demand notices issued by the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department regarding shop premises.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to dispose of petitioners' appeals under Section 34 A (3) of the Tamil Nadu HR & CE Act, 1959 within four weeks; further proceedings stayed.

Muthukrishnan.M.R Vs the Commissioner — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

In W.P.(MD) No.3345 of 2022:-

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.02.2022

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.(MD) Nos.3345 to 3350 of 2022 and WMP Nos.2920, 2923, 2922, 2926, 2921 and 2924 of 2022

¶5

M.R.Muthukrishnan ... Petitioner In WP(MD).3345/2022

¶6

T.Inbam ... Petitioner In WP(MD).3346,3349 & 3350/2022 P.Karthikeyan ... Petitioner In WP(MD).3347/2022 B.Ravichandran ... Petitioner In WP(MD).3348/2022

¶7

/vs./

¶8

1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department Mahathma Gandhi Road, Numgambakkam, Chennai - 34

¶9

2.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department Tiruchirappalli 620 006

¶10

3.The Executive Officer/Assistant Commissioner, Arulmigu Thayumanaswamy Thirukoil, Rock Fort, Tiruchirappalli 620 002. ... Respondents in all the petitions

¶11

COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned demand notice of the 3^rd respondent vide Na.Ka.No.428/2020/A5 dated 28/01/2022 with respect to the petitioner's shop premise at 50-F, No.2, 50-B, 50-C, 50-H, 50-IO, respectively, Malaivasal/Utchimalai, Trichy-2 and quash the same.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

1/2

¶14

In W.P.(MD) No.3345 of 2022:-

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Thiyagarajan For R1 & R2 : Mr.P.Subbaraj, Special Government Pleader For R3 : Mr.M.Saravanan

¶16

COMMON ORDER

¶17

In all these writ petitions, Mr.P.Subbaraj, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.M.Saravanan, learned counsel takes notice for the 3^rd respondent.

¶18

2.After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents 1 and 2 and the learned counsel for the 3^rd respondent, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the 1^st respondent, namely, the Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Chennai – 34, to dispose of the appeals filed by the petitioners under Section 34 A (3) of the Tamil Nadu HR & CE Act, 1959 in A.Nos.54, 61, 56, 57, 60 and 59 of 2021, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. All further proceedings shall be subject to the outcome of the orders to be passed in the aforesaid appeals. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶19

// True Copy //

¶20

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶21

¶22

1.The Commissioner,

¶23

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department Mahathma Gandhi Road, Numgambakkam, Chennai - 34

¶24

2.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department Tiruchirappalli 620 006

¶25

+6 cc to Mr.P.THIYAGARAJAN, Advocate, SR.No.8523,8524,8525,8526, 8527,8528,

¶26

+6 cc to Mr.M.SARAVANAN, Advocate, SR.No.8238

¶27

+1 cc to SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SR.No.8354

¶28

W.P.(MD) Nos.3345 to 3350 of 2022 23.02.2022

¶29

SA(11.03.2022) 2P 16C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

2/2

Muthukrishnan.M.R v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muthukrishnan.M.R v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Mahalingam Vs the Commissioner

Mr.P.Muthukumar, Vs the Joint Commissioner

Peer Mohammed Vs the Commissioner

Elambarithi Vs the Commissioner

Nagarajan .P Vs the Joint Commissioner

Baskar K Vs the District Collector