Disposed

S. Ramani v. the Principal Secretary to Govt.

Madras HC24 Nov 2022WP(MD)/3104/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed an appeal with stay against an eviction notice dated 22.01.2020 on merits within three weeks and directed the authorities to remove encroachments following due process within twelve weeks, disposing of both writ petitions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to file appeal with stay; authorities directed to remove encroachments following due process within twelve weeks.

S. Ramani Vs the Principal Secretary to Govt. — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.(MD) Nos.3104 of 2020 & 12487 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 24.11.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

¶7

W.P.(MD)Nos.3104 of 2020 &12487 of 2021 and

¶8

W.M.P.(MD)Nos.2643 and 2644 of 2020

¶9

S.Ramani ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.3104 of 2020 A.Vins Anto ...Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.12487 of 2021

¶10

-Vs-

¶11

1.The Principal Secretary to Government,

¶12

Revenue Department,

¶13

Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

¶14

2.The District Collector,

¶15

Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.

¶16

Page 1 of 10

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.(MD) Nos.3104 of 2020 & 12487 of 2021

¶19

3.The Tahsildar,

¶20

Karungal Taluk, Karungal, Kanyakumari District.

¶21

4.The Assistant Engineer, Water Resource Organization, Public Works Department, Pattanangal Branch, Karungal, Kanyakumari District.

¶22

... Respondents

¶23

in W.P.(MD)No.3104 of 2020

¶24

1.The District Collector,

¶25

Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.

¶26

2.The Executive Engineer,

¶27

Kodayar Basin Division, Water Resources Organization, Public Works Department, Nagercoil.

¶28

3.The Assistant Engineer,

¶29

Pattanangal Irrigation Section, Water Resources Organization, Public Works Department, Karungal, Kanyakumari District.

¶30

Page 2 of 10

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P.(MD) Nos.3104 of 2020 & 12487 of 2021

¶33

4.The Tahsildar,

¶34

Killiyoor Taluk,

¶35

Tholayavattam Post, Kanyakumari District.

¶36

5.The Superintendent of Police,

¶37

Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.

¶38

6.Ayyappadoss

7.Leelabai

8.Rukmani

9.Ramani

10.Bagavathiyamma

... Respondents

in W.P.(MD)No.12487 of 2021

¶45

PRAYER in W.P.(MD)No.3104 of 2020: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the entire records pertaining to the order of eviction issued by the 4^th respondent in proceedings vide Form-III under Rule 6(1) of Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Act, 2007, dated 22.01.2020 and quash the same as illegal.

¶46

PRAYER in W.P.(MD)No.12487 of 2021: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 to remove the encroachments made by the respondents 6 to 10 in

¶47

Page 3 of 10

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶49

W.P.(MD) Nos.3104 of 2020 & 12487 of 2021

¶50

Periyakulam comprised in R.S.No.337/8 and in the Branch Canal from Pattanangal running through 336/16 of Keezhmidalam 'B' Village, Killiyoor Taluk, Kanyakumari District pursuant to Form-III notice dated 09.01.2019 issued by the 3^rd respondent under Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Rules, 2007.

¶51

In W.P.(MD)No.3104 of 2020

¶52

For Petitioner : Mr.K.P.Krishna Doss For Respondents : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar

¶53

Government Pleader

¶54

In W.P.(MD)No.12487 of 2021

¶55

For Petitioner : Mr.C.T.Perumal For R1 to R4 : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar Government Pleader For R5 : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor For R6 to R8 & 10 : No Appearance For R9 : Mr.K.P.Krishna Doss

¶56

COMMON ORDER

¶57

[Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.]

¶58

W.P.(MD)No.3104 of 2020 is filed, challenging the eviction notice

¶59

dated 22.01.2020, issued by the 4^th respondent in Form-III under Rule 6(1) of

¶60

Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Act, 2007.

¶61

Page 4 of 10

¶62

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶63

W.P.(MD) Nos.3104 of 2020 & 12487 of 2021

¶64

2.W.P.(MD)No.12487 of 2021 is filed seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 to remove the encroachments made by the respondents 6 to 10 in Periyakulam comprised in R.S.No.337/8 and in the Branch Canal from Pattanangal running through R.S.No.336/16 of Keezhmidalam 'B' Village, Killiyoor Taluk, Kanyakumari District pursuant to Form-III notice dated 09.01.2019 issued by the 3^rd respondent under Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Rules, 2007.

¶65

3.The claim of the petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.12487 of 2021 is that despite the eviction notice dated 09.01.2019 issued by the 3^rd respondent, the respondents 6 to 10 have not removed the encroachments. Hence, he sent a representation dated 09.03.2021 to the respondents 1 to 5, seeking removal of encroachments. Finding inaction on the part of the official respondents, he has come up with the said Writ Petition.

¶66

Page 5 of 10

¶67

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶68

W.P.(MD) Nos.3104 of 2020 & 12487 of 2021

¶69

4.Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.3104 of 2020 submitted that it is suffice, if the petitioner is permitted to file an appeal along with stay application against the impugned eviction notice dated 22.01.2020 before the Appellate Authority concerned with a direction to the Appellate Authority to consider and dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame, for which, the learned Government Pleader for the respondents 1 to 4 is agreeable.

¶70

5.In view of the above, without going into the merits of the case, this Court permits the petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.3104 of 2020 to file an appeal along with stay application before the Appellate Authority concerned, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of such appeal along with stay application, the Appellate Authority is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks thereafter. Till the disposal of the appeal or stay application, the status-quo prevailing as on date shall be maintained by both the parties.

¶71

Page 6 of 10

¶72

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶73

W.P.(MD) Nos.3104 of 2020 & 12487 of 2021

¶74

6.Since no appeal is stated to be pending against the eviction notice dated 09.01.2019, the authorities concerned are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.12487 of 2021, dated 09.03.2021 and take appropriate action for removal of encroachments, if any, in the place in question, after affording sufficient opportunity to all the parties concerned and by following due process of law. Such an exercise shall be completed within a

¶75

period of twelve weeks from the date of disposal of the appeal to be filed by the petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.3104 of 2020.

¶76

7.With the above directions, these Writ Petitions stand disposed of. No

¶77

costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶78

24.11.2022

¶79

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶80

Myr