Disposed
Pasupathy .S v. the District Collector
Madras HCWP(MD)/3055/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD) No.3055 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 24.11.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
W.P.(MD)No.3055 of 2022
S.Pasupathy ... Petitioner
-Vs-
1.The District Collector,
Ramanathapuram,
Ramanathapuram District.
2.The Tahsildar,
Kadaladi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.
3.P.Marinathan 4.Vinitha
... Respondents
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to remove the
Page 1 of 4
W.P.(MD) No.3055 of 2022
encroachment done by the respondents 3 and 4 obstructing the water channel running under S.Nos.126/1A, 126/1B1, 126/3 & 126/2 for consequential order.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.R.Laxman For R1 and R2 : Mr.S.P.Maharajan, Special Government Pleader For R3 and R4 : Mr.C.Arul Vadivel @ Sekar
ORDER
[Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.]
This Writ Petition is filed seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to remove the encroachment made by the respondents 3 and 4, obstructing the water channel running through S.Nos.126/1A, 126/1B1, 126/3 & 126/2 within a time frame.
2.Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents 1 and 2 has produced the written communication of the 2nd respondent dated 08.03.2022 vide proceedings in Na.Ka.B2/1515/2022, addressed to him and submitted that there are no
Page 2 of 4
W.P.(MD) No.3055 of 2022
encroachments as alleged by the petitioner and the lands in question are nothing but private patta lands.
3.At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to approach the authorities concerned pointing out the encroachments made in the public property.
4.In view of the above, recording the aforesaid communication of the 2nd respondent dated 08.03.2022 and granting such liberty to the petitioner to approach the authorities concerned, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.
[R.M.D., J.] & [J.S.N.P., J.]
24.11.2022
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No
Myr
Page 3 of 4
W.P.(MD) No.3055 of 2022
R.MAHADEVAN, J. AND
J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
Myr
To
1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.
2.The Tahsildar, Kadaladi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.
W.P.(MD)No.3055 of 2022
24.11.2022
Page 4 of 4
S.Pasupathy
The District Collector, Ramanathapuram
The Tahsildar, Kadaladi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District
P.Marinathan
Vinitha
R.MAHADEVAN
J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court