Disposed

M/s.Sivalingam Silk Cotton Factory v. The Authorized Officer

Madras HC23 Dec 2022WP(MD)/29062/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench disposed of a writ petition challenging a banking possession notice. The court ordered the petitioners to pay Rs. 30 lakhs by 03.01.2023 and the remainder in five equal monthly installments.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to pay Rs. 30,00,000/- on or before 03.01.2023 and the balance in five consecutive equal monthly instalments; no coercive steps to be taken till payment made.

M/s.Sivalingam Silk Cotton Factory Vs The Authorized… — Banking and Recovery | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.29062 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 23.12.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶6

W.P(MD)No.29062 of 2022 and

¶7

W.M.P(MD)No.23040 of 2022

¶8

1.M/s.Sivalingam Silk Cotton Factory, Sole Proprietor P.Krishan, S/o.Paramasivam, No.8/69, South Raja Street, Bodinayakanur, Theni District.

¶9

2.M/s.Sivalingam Company, (A Partnership firm represented by its Partners), P.Krishnan, K.Gopalan, S/o.Krishnan, No.8/47, Railway Station Road, Bodinayakanur, Theni District.

¶10

3.M/s.Amman Agencies, Sole Proprietor K.Gopalan, S/o/.Krishnan, No.8/69, South Raja Street, Bodinayakanur, Theni District. ... Petitioners

¶11

vs.

¶12

1/5

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

W.P(MD)No.29062 of 2022

¶15

The Authorized Officer, Karur Vysya Bank, Asset Recovery Branch, R.S.No.170/9, Uthangudi Village, Near Mattuthavani Bus Stand, Madurai – 625 107. ... Respondent

¶16

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Ceritorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned possession notice dated 28.11.2022 issued by the respondent Bank and quash the same as illegal.

¶17

For Petitioners : Mr.J.Senthil Kumar For Respondent : Mr.R.Pandivel Standing Counsel

¶18

ORDER

¶19

(Order of the Court was made by D. KRISHNAKUMAR, J.)

¶20

Mr.R.Pandivel, learned standing counsel takes notice for the respondent. By consent of both the parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the time of admission itself.

¶21

2.Challenging the impugned possession notice, dated

¶22

28.11.2022 issued by the respondent, the petitioners have filed the present

¶23

Writ Petition.

¶24

2/5

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P(MD)No.29062 of 2022

¶27

3.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has fairly submitted that the petitioners undertake to pay a sum of Rs.30,00,000/- (Rupees Thirty Lakhs Only) on or before 03.01.2023 and the remaining entire outstanding amount in seven consecutive equal monthly instalments and the same shall be paid on or before 30^th day of every English Calendar month until the entire payment is made and to that extent, he seeks indulgence of this Court to consider the request made by the petitioners.

¶28

4.The learned counsel appearing for the respondent Bank has agreed for the said proposal made by the petitioners, however, the learned counsel submitted that the balance amount to be paid by the petitioners within five months and he further seeks liberty to the respondent Bank to proceed against the petitioners in case of default in payment of any one of the instalments.

¶29

5.Considering the submissions made on either side, the petitioners are directed to pay a sum of Rs.30,00,000/- (Rupees Thirty Lakhs Only) on or before 03.01.2023 and the remaining outstanding amount shall be paid in five consecutive equal monthly instalments. The

¶30

3/5

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P(MD)No.29062 of 2022

¶33

first instalment shall be paid on or before 30.02.2023 and the subsequent four instalments shall be paid on or before 30^th day of every English Calendar month until the entire payment is made. Till such time, no coercive steps shall be taken by the respondent. If the petitioners fails to pay the amount in any one of the instalments, the respondent Bank may proceed further in accordance with law.

¶34

With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶35

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes ps

¶36

[D.K.K.,J.] [R.V.,J.] 23.12.2022

¶37

¶38

The Authorized Officer, Karur Vysya Bank, Asset Recovery Branch, R.S.No.170/9, Uthangudi Village, Near Mattuthavani Bus Stand, Madurai – 625 107.

¶39

4/5

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

W.P(MD)No.29062 of 2022

¶42

D. KRISHNAKUMAR,J. and R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.

¶43

¶44

ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.29062 of 2022

¶45

DATED : 23.12.2022

¶46

5/5

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M/s.Sivalingam Silk Cotton Factory v. The Authorized Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Sivalingam Silk Cotton Factory v. The Authorized Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Tamilarasi Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Thiruvikka.S Vs The Chief Election Commissioner

U.P.Sathaya Vs P.Karthikeyan

Balakrishnan. P Vs The Authorized Officer

Nagarajan. M Vs The Authorized Officer

M.Mahadevan, Vs The Commissioner