Disposed

Thiruvikka.S v. The Chief Election Commissioner

Madras HC22 Dec 2022WP(MD)/26246/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench allowed the Returning Officer to publish the result of the Karur District Panchayat Vice Chairman election. The Court also ordered the transfer of a criminal case alleging the petitioner's abduction to an Additional Superintendent of Police for investigation before final decision on the election result.

What did the court decide?

The petition was disposed of, the Returning Officer was permitted to publish the election result, and the criminal case was transferred to the Additional Superintendent of Police for investigation.

Thiruvikka.S Vs The Chief Election Commissioner — Election Law | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.26246 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 22.12.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶7

W.P.(MD)No.26246 of 2022

S.Thiruvikka

... Petitioner

-Vs-

1.The Chief Election Commissioner,

¶12

State Election Commission,

¶13

No.208/2, Jawaharlal Nehru Road,

¶14

CMBT, Arumbakkam, Chennai.

¶15

2.The District Election Officer,

¶16

The District Collector, Karur,

¶17

Karur District.

¶18

3.The Returning Officer,

¶19

District Panchayat Council Election,

¶20

Karur District.

¶21

Page 1 of 6

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P.(MD) No.26246 of 2022

¶24

4.The Superintendent of Police,

¶25

Karur, Karur District.

¶26

... Respondents

¶27

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 herein to forthwith issue notification for conduct of the Karur District Panchayat Vice Chairman election and conduct the election under the supervision of retired Hon'ble High Court Judge or by any other retired District Judge with adequate police protection and further to direct the respondents to videograph the entire election process so as to ensure free and fair election without any irregularities within a time frame fixed by this Court.

¶28

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lajapathy Roy, For Mr.J.Senthil Kumaraiah For R1 : Mr.B.Saravanan, Standing Counsel For R2 and R3 : Mr.Veera.Kathiravan, Additional Advocate General, assisted by Mr.P.Thilak Kumar, Government Pleader For R4 : Mr.S.Manikandan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶29

Page 2 of 6

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

W.P.(MD) No.26246 of 2022

¶32

ORDER

¶33

[Order of the Court was made by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.]

¶34

This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus,

¶35

to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to forthwith issue a notification to conduct election for the post of Vice Chairman for Karur District Panchayat under the supervision of retired Hon'ble High Court Judge or by any other retired District Judge with adequate police protection and further, to direct the respondents to videograph the entire election process, so as to ensure free and fair election without any irregularities within a time frame.

¶36

2.Earlier, this Court, by an interim order dated 16.12.2022, passed the

¶37

following order:-

¶38

(i)The 3^rd respondent is directed to conduct the election as scheduled on 19.12.2022;

¶39

(ii)The entire election process shall be videographed by the 3^rd respondent;

¶40

(iii)The 3^rd respondent shall count the votes, however, not publish the final result of the election until further orders of this Court; and

¶41

Page 3 of 6

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

W.P.(MD) No.26246 of 2022

¶44

(iv)The 3^rd respondent is directed to file a report in the sealed cover before this Court on 22.12.2022 ;

¶45

3.Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner made an allegation that the petitioner was abducted at 11.50 a.m on 19.12.2022, whereas the election was scheduled to be held at 2.30 p.m., on the same date. Therefore, the petitioner was prevented from participating in the election. In this regard, a complaint has also been lodged in Crime No.360 of 2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 324, 427 and 363 IPC on the file of the Vedasandur Police Station, Dindigul, however, no action has been taken till date.

¶46

4.The learned Additional Advocate General for the respondents 2 and 3 submitted that pursuant to the interim order of this Court dated 16.12.2022, the 3^rd respondent has conducted the election on 19.12.2022 and one group has got majority of seven votes and other group has got 4 votes. On the side of the petitioner, one Ramesh has been nominated for the post of Vice Chairman and has secured 4 votes. Therefore, the 3^rd respondent may be permitted to publish the result and declare the elected candidate.

¶47

Page 4 of 6

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶49

W.P.(MD) No.26246 of 2022

¶50

5.In view of the above, the 3^rd respondent is permitted to publish the result and declare the elected candidate. In the meantime, the aforesaid case in Crime No.360 of 2022 shall be transferred to the file of the Additional Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, who shall conduct a detailed investigation on merits and in accordance with law. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 16.12.2022, the 3^rd respondent has produced the sealed cover before this Court and the same is now returned to the learned Additional Advocate General.

¶51

6.With the above observation, this Writ Petition stands disposed of.

¶52

No costs.

¶53

[D.K.K., J.] & [R.V., J.] 22.12.2022

¶54

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Myr

¶55

¶56

1.The Chief Election Commissioner, State Election Commission, No.208/2, Jawaharlal Nehru Road, CMBT, Arumbakkam, Chennai.

¶57

Page 5 of 6

¶58

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶59

W.P.(MD) No.26246 of 2022

¶60

D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J. AND

¶61

R.VIJAYAKUMAR , J.

¶62

Myr

¶63

2.The District Election Officer, The District Collector, Karur, Karur District.

¶64

3.The Returning Officer, District Panchayat Council Election, Karur District.

¶65

4.The Superintendent of Police,

¶66

Karur, Karur District.

¶67

5.The Additional Superintendent of Police, Dindigul.

¶68

W.P.(MD)No.26246 of 2022

¶69

22.12.2022

¶70

Page 6 of 6

¶71

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Thiruvikka.S v. The Chief Election Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thiruvikka.S v. The Chief Election Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Premnath Vs the District Collector

A.M.P. Shunmugavel Vs the District Collector

Mohaideen Abdul Kathar.P Vs the Chief Manager

Gopi Raghul K Vs The Additional Chief Secretary

Maruthaiyammal. S Vs The Authorized Officer

Subburaj. M Vs The State of Tamil Nadu