Irulappan. P v. the District Registrar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD).No.206 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 15.11.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
W.P(MD)No.206 of 2022
P.Irulappan ... Petitioner
vs.
... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to enquire and pass orders on the petitioner's complaint dated 09.11.2021 and pursuant to the notice of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No. 5776/A2/2021 dated 13.12.2021 more particularly within a time frame as may be stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Pooventhera Rajan For R1 : Mr.A.Kannan Additional Government Pleader For R2 : No appearance
1/3
W.P.(MD).No.206 of 2022
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission
of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also given a letter dated 10.11.2022, to the Registry to that effect.
withdrawn. No costs.
15.11.2022
Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No akv To The District Registrar, O/o.District Registrar, Periyakulam, Then District.
2/3
W.P.(MD).No.206 of 2022
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN,J.
akv
W.P(MD)No.206 of 2022
15.11.2022
3/3
P.Irulappan
The District Registrar, O/o.District Registrar, Periyakulam
P.Rasu
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court