In Cont.P.(MD) No.440 of 2021, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court disposed of a contempt petition filed for non-compliance of an earlier order. The court closed the petition upon producing a rejection order and granted liberty to challenge the result.
Contempt Petition closed; liberty granted to challenge the rejection order in the manner known to law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P(MD)No.440 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 15.11.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
Cont.P(MD)No.440 of 2021 in W.P(MD)No.2175 of 2018
P.Gunasekaran
... Petitioner
Vs.
Mr.Chandrasekaran, The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Andipatti. ... Respondent
Prayer:- Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, praying to punish the respondent for willfully and wantonly showing disrespect and thereby, disobeying the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD) No.2175 of 2018, dated 03.08.2018.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Sivachandran For Respondent : Mr.D.Sadiq Raja Additional Government Pleader
1/4
ORDER
Cont.P(MD)No.440 of 2021
Alleging that the order of this Court in W.P(MD)No.2175 of 2018, dated 03.08.2018, has not been complied with, the petitioner has come up before this Court with this Contempt Petition.
learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent, has produced a proceedings of the respondent in Na.Ka.No.4819/2017/Aa1, dated 04.11.2022, and submitted that the request of the petitioner was considered and rejected.
petitioner to challenge the said order in the manner known to law.
Index : Yes / No smn2
15.11.2022
2/4
Cont.P(MD)No.440 of 2021
To
Mr.Chandrasekaran, The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Andipatti.
3/4
Cont.P(MD)No.440 of 2021
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.
smn2
Cont.P(MD)No.440 of 2021
15.11.2022
4/4
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent has failed to comply with the order in W.P.(MD) No.2175 of 2018.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to immediate punishment against the respondent.
P.Gunasekaran
Mr.Chandrasekaran
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
