R.Karunanithi, v. the Vigilance Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.20385 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.01.2022 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.(MD)No.20385 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD)No.18147 of 2018
R.Karunanithi
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Vigilance Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Vigilance Commission, Secretariat, St. George Fort, Chennai. 2.The Secretary, Commercial Tax and Registration Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chennai. 3.The Director, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Wing, Chennai.
4.The Superintendent of Police, Southern Range, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Wing, Chennai. 5.The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Wing, Trichy.
6.V.Ramasamy ... Respondents
PRAYER:- Writ Petition - filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents restraining to conduct enquiry based on pseudonymous petition allegedly filed by the 6th respondent, without obtaining prior sanction from the Head of the department/Government as contemplated in the Tamil Nadu Vigilance Manual.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Karunanithi
- respondent
The Vigilance Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Vigilance Commission
- respondent
The Secretary, Commercial Tax and Registration Department, Government of Tamil Nadu
- respondent
The Director, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Wing
- respondent
The Superintendent of Police, Southern Range, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Wing
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court