K. Gnanathangam v. Joint Registrar of
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court closed the writ petition challenging a rejection of an appeal against discharge from disciplinary proceedings, holding it became infructuous as the third respondent had retired by the time of the hearing.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition closed as infructuous with no costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.17115 of 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 25.07.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
W.P(MD)No.17115 of 2012 and
M.P(MD)No.1 of 2012
K.Gnanathangam
... Petitioner
Vs.
- 1.The Joint Registrar of Co-operatives, Kanyakumari Region, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.
- 2.The Special Officer, Kanyakumari District, Central Co-operative Bank, Alexandra Press Road, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition arises since the third respondent had attained superannuation prior to the filing of the petition?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Gnanathangam
- respondent
The Joint Registrar of Co-operatives, Kanyakumari Region, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District
- respondent
The Special Officer, Kanyakumari District, Central Co-operative Bank, Alexandra Press Road, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District
- respondent
C.Murugesan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court