The Superintending Engineer, v. the Inspector of Labour
Case brief
What is this about?
This Division Bench directed the TNEB authority to examine the Second Respondent's claim for absorption in service based on the Settlement dated 10.08.2007. The Court laid down a procedure for scrutiny, inquiry, and passing a reasoned order, noting that the petitioner's contentions would be considered later.
What did the court decide?
Directing the Second Respondent to submit application for absorption by 31.05.2021 and the authority to consider it by 30.06.2021.
What the court decided
W.P.(MD) No.14607 of 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.04.2021 CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU W.P(MD) No. 14607 of 2012
and
M.P(MD)No.2 of 2012
1.The Superintending Engineer,
Dindigul Electricity Distribution Circle,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd.,
Dindigul.
2.The Assistant Engineer,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd.,
Sithaiyankottai, Dindigul. ... Petitioners
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the claim for absorption in service based on a Settlement entered by TNEB with Labour Unions under Section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 warrants examination by the concerned auth
Whether the Writ Petitioners were proper parties to challenge the grant of permanent status to the Second Respondent.
What procedure should the concerned authority of TNEB follow to examine the claim of absorption in service.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
The Superintending Engineer, Dindigul Electricity Distribution Circle, Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd.
- petitioner
The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd.
- respondent
The Inspector of Labour, Dindigul
- respondent
M. Ramakrishnan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court