J.Muthukumar v. S.Mohan Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2020 in W.P. No. 13347 of 2017 P.D.…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.M.P. No. 4619 of 2020 in
W.P. No. 13347 of 2017
P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, J.
Since the Proposed Respondent contends that he would be prejudicially affected if the relief sought by the Petitioners is granted to them, he is necessary party for the effectual and complete adjudication of the
Writ Petition.
2. This Petition is ordered.
04.03.2022 1/3
vjt
Note: Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the Writ Petition pursuant to the aforesaid order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioners
- respondent
Proposed Respondent
Coram
P.D. AUDIKESAVALU
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court