2.According to the petitioner, the properties are the private patta properties and Tamil Nadu Boodan Board has no right whatsoever over the said property. The petitioner's vendors had filed a suit in O.S.No.219 of 2001, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil, as against the Boodan Board for the relief of mandatory injunction that the board should not disturb with regard to the half share of the plaintiffs therein and should not transfer any revenue records as against the plaintiff therein. The suit came to be decreed on 26.03.2003 and the same has become final. Thereafter, the petitioner has purchased to the property in dispute by way of registered document, dated 20.07.2010. At the time of registration, the Sub Registrar entertained a doubt whether the land standing in the name of Boodan board in the revenue records could be registered. The concerned Sub Registrar has also issued a notice to the Boodan Board. However, there was no response from the Boodan Board. The Sub Registrar did not proceed to register the documents. Hence, the petitioner had filed W.P.(MD).No.13588 of 2010, in which, the Boodan Board was made as the Second respondent. Though this Court had issued notice to the second respondent and the notice was served upon them, there was no appearance on the side of the Boodan Board. Thereafter, this Court was pleased to pass an order on 05.04.2011 directing the Sub Registrar to register the sale deed in favour of the writ petitioner.
