Disposed

R.Veera Selvi, v. the District Collector

Madras HC14 Dec 2022WP(MD)/13561/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondents to act on representations regarding the closure of loan accounts and release of title deeds. The court directed the first respondent to consider the representation after hearing other respondents within eight weeks and disposed of the petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

First respondent directed to consider representation and pass order after hearing respondents 3 and 4 within eight weeks.

R.Veera Selvi, Vs the District Collector — Madras HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

W.P(MD)No.13561 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 14.12.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.13561 of 2019

¶7

1.R.Veera Selvi

¶8

2.K.Mahadevan

¶9

3.A.Kala

4.M.Malaichandran

... Petitioners

Vs.

1.The District Collector, The Collectorate Building, Ramanathapuram District.

¶14

2.The Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, KTM Building, Salai Street, Ramanathapuram.

¶15

3.The General Manager, RDCC Bank, Vandikara Street, Ramanathapuram Taluk & District.

¶16

4.The Secretary, The Agricultural Primary Cooperative Credit Society, Q1214, Thoruvalur Village and Post, Ramanathapuram Taluk & District. ... Respondents

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

1/4

¶19

W.P(MD)No.13561 of 2019

¶20

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to pass appropriate orders based on the representation of the petitioner dated 28/02/2019 submitted to respondents No.1 and 2 and the representation dated 11/04/2019 submitted to the 3rd respondent, directing to close the loan accounts and to release the Documents of title deeds to the petitioners.

¶21

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Murugan

¶22

For Respondents : Mr.SR.A.Ramachandran, Adll. Government Pleader for R1 & R2. Mr.D.Shanmugaraja Sethupathi for R3.

¶23

ORDER

¶24

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶25

2.The only request made in the writ petition is for directing the respondents 1 and 2 to pass orders on the petition mentioned representation.

¶26

3.The first respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass order therein after hearing the respondents 3 and 4. Such an order will be passed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

2/4

¶29

W.P(MD)No.13561 of 2019

¶30

4.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶31

14.12.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-

¶32

1.The District Collector, The Collectorate Building, Ramanathapuram District.

¶33

2.The Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, KTM Building, Salai Street, Ramanathapuram.

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

¶35

W.P(MD)No.13561 of 2019

¶36

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

¶37

ias

¶38

W.P(MD)No.13561 of 2019

¶39

14.12.2022

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

R.Veera Selvi, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Veera Selvi, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.M.Polytechnic College, Vs the Member Secretary

S.Xavier, S/O.a.Sebastian Vs the Vice-Chancellor

Higher Secondary School Vs the Government of Tamilnadu

V.P.Jayachandran Vs the Bank Manager

Shenbagavalli Vs the Distrit Collector

Masanmuthu Vs the Distrit Collector